Judges cite procedural flaws tied to papal decrees, requiring renewed proceedings while leaving prior convictions formally intact.<\/p>\n
The Vatican Court of Appeal has ordered a partial retrial in the high-profile London property finance case, ruling that key parts of the original proceedings were invalid due to procedural issues.<\/p>\n
The case stems from the Vatican Secretariat of State\u2019s investment of approximately 350 million pounds in a luxury property in London\u2019s Chelsea neighborhood on Sloane Avenue, an operation that generated estimated losses of up to 139 million euros for the Holy See.<\/p>\n
In a March 17 decision, judges found a \u201crelative nullity\u201d in the trial involving the Secretariat of State\u2019s investment in the London building, widely known as the \u201ctrial of the century.\u201d The ruling does not overturn the original trial or its verdicts but requires that portions of the case be reheard.<\/p>\n
The original trial concluded in December 2023 after 86 hearings. The Vatican tribunal sentenced Cardinal Angelo Becciu to five years and six months in prison, along with a lifetime ban from public office, marking the first time a cardinal had ever been convicted by a Holy See court. Nine of the 10 defendants were found guilty of various charges, including embezzlement, fraud, money laundering, and abuse of power.<\/p>\n
The court determined that four decrees issued by Pope Francis during the investigation \u2014 which altered procedural rules and were not publicly promulgated \u2014 undermined the legitimacy of some investigative acts.<\/p>\n
As a result, prosecutors must refile the full body of evidence by April 30, with a new timetable for proceedings to follow.<\/p>\n
The original trial ended with prison sentences totaling more than 37 years and roughly 200 million euros (about $231 million) in damages ordered.<\/p>\n
Defense attorneys had long argued that the case was compromised by incomplete evidence filings and procedural irregularities. The appeals court upheld many of those objections while maintaining that the first-instance judgment still carries legal effect.<\/p>\n
The case centers on the Secretariat of State\u2019s controversial London property investment along with related financial dealings involving Becciu and other defendants.<\/p>\n
The ruling marks a major development in the Vatican\u2019s most complex financial prosecution in recent history and raises fresh uncertainty about the durability of the original convictions.<\/p>\n
Denne artikel blev oprindeligt udgivet af EWTN News English.<\/p>\n